| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|\
| |
| | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In order to ensure that the Kubernetes machinery can determine when the
Kibana Pods are becoming ready, we need to add a readiness probe to the
Containers that make up those pods. The Kibana readiness probe simply
hits the base URL at `http://localhost:5601/` and expects a 200.
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
When we currently create the set of logging `DeploymentConfig`s, we
create them with zero desired replicas. This causes the deployment to
immediately succeed as there is no work to be done. This inhibits our
ability to use nice CLI UX features like `oc rollout status` to monitor
the logging stack deployments. Instead, we should can create the configs
with the correct number of replicas in the first place and stop using
`oc scale` to bring them up after the fact.
Signed-off-by: Steve Kuznetsov <skuznets@redhat.com>
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|\ \
| | |
| | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | | |
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | |/
| |/|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
We are moving toward having adhoc post-install checks and so the
"preflight" designation needs to be widened.
Updated location to playbooks/byo/openshift-checks, added health check playbook, and updated README.
Also included the certificate_expiry playbooks.
Left behind symlinks and wrappers for existing checks.
To conform with the direction of the rest of the repo, the
openshift-checks playbooks are split into two directories, one under
playbooks/common with the actual invocation and one under
playbooks/byo for entrypoints that are just wrappers for the ones in common.
Because the certificate_expiry playbooks are intended not just to be
functional but to be examples that users modify, I did not split them
similarly. That could happen later after discussion but for now I just
left them whole under byo/openshift-checks/certificate_expiry.
|
|\ \ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
juanvallejo/jvallejo/update-docker-image-availability-check
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| |/ / / /
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
This change allows for the specification of JSON objects like
lists as parameters to templates.
Signed-off-by: Jose A. Rivera <jarrpa@redhat.com>
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|/ /
|/| | | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Removing requirement to pass aws credentials
|
| | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Move etcd upgrade code into role
|
| | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Bug 1447019
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | | | | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
GitHubIdentityProvider provides the ability to authenticate against
GitHub organization teams [1].
This adds the attribute as optional so that users do not get the error
"provider GitHubIdentityProvider contains unknown keys teams".
[1]: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.5/install_config/configuring_authentication.html#GitHub
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| |_|_|_|_|_|_|/ /
|/| | | | | | | | |
Merged by openshift-bot
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
github.com:juanvallejo/openshift-ansible into jvallejo/add-etcd-volume-check
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
It was agreed to name role variables as `r_ROLE_NAME_VARIABLE_NAME`. Giving it a try.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |/ / / / / / / / |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
We don't need to convert to int and then to float. Read it as float from the start.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
It has been agreed that we don't use it any longer.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| |_|_|_|_|/ / /
|/| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
I should've noticed before merging...
|
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
add ability to expose Elasticsearch as an external route
|
| | |_|_|_|_|_|/
| |/| | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
This adds the ability to expose Elastisearch as a route outside of the
cluster.
- `openshift_logging_es_allow_external`: True (default is False) - if this is
True, Elasticsearch will be exposed as a Route
- `openshift_logging_es_ops_hostname`: The external facing hostname to use for
the route and the TLS server certificate (default is "es." +
`openshift_master_default_subdomain`)
There are other similar parameters for the TLS server cert, key, and CA cert.
There are other similar parameters for when the OPS cluster is deployed e.g.
`openshift_logging_es_ops_allow_external`, etc.
|